RRSIG ulisboa.pt/A alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/AAAA alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/DNSKEY alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/DNSKEY alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/DNSKEY alg 5, id 502: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/DNSKEY alg 5, id 502: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/MX alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/NS alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/SOA alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
RRSIG ulisboa.pt/TXT alg 5, id 4368: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 5 (RSASHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
pt to ulisboa.pt: The following NS name(s) were found in the authoritative NS RRset, but not in the delegation NS RRset (i.e., in the pt zone): c.ul.pt See RFC 1034, Sec. 4.2.2.
pt to ulisboa.pt: The glue address(es) for ns2.tecnico.ulisboa.pt (2001:690:2100:1::2) differed from its authoritative address(es) (2001:690:2100:1::2, 2001:690:2100:1::53:2). See RFC 1034, Sec. 4.2.2.
ulisboa.pt/NS: No response was received until the UDP payload size was decreased, indicating that the server might be attempting to send a payload that exceeds the path maximum transmission unit (PMTU) size. See RFC 6891, Sec. 6.2.6. (2001:690:21c0:a::150, 2001:690:21c0:b::150, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
ulisboa.pt/TXT: No response was received until the UDP payload size was decreased, indicating that the server might be attempting to send a payload that exceeds the path maximum transmission unit (PMTU) size. See RFC 6891, Sec. 6.2.6. (194.117.0.150, 194.117.1.150, 2001:690:21c0:a::150, 2001:690:21c0:b::150, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
ulisboa.pt/DNSKEY has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
vbt1hlxypf.ulisboa.pt/A has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
ulisboa.pt/NSEC3PARAM has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
ulisboa.pt/CNAME has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.