View on GitHub

DNSViz: A DNS visualization tool

insecure.mufj.jp

DNSSEC options (hide)
  1. |?|
  2. |?|
  3. |?|
  4. |?|
  5. |?|
  6. |?|
  7. |?|
  8. |?|
  9. |?|
  10. |?|
Notices
DNSSEC Authentication Chain

RRset statusRRset status

Insecure (2)
  • insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME
  • www.e-ontap.com/A
Secure (3)
  • com/SOA
  • com/SOA
  • mufj.jp/SOA

DNSKEY/DS/NSEC statusDNSKEY/DS/NSEC status

Secure (13)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 20326)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 26116)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of e-ontap.com/DS
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS
  • com/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 30909)
  • com/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 31510)
  • com/DS (alg 8, id 30909)
  • jp/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 39595)
  • jp/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 63825)
  • jp/DS (alg 8, id 39595)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 7, id 19682)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 7, id 60678)
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678)
Non_existent (1)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 13, id 18023)

Delegation statusDelegation status

Insecure (2)
  • com to e-ontap.com
  • mufj.jp to insecure.mufj.jp
Secure (3)
  • . to com
  • . to jp
  • jp to mufj.jp

NoticesNotices

Errors (13)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME alg 13, id 18023: The Signer's Name field of the RRSIG RR (mufj.jp) does not match the name of the zone containing the RRset (insecure.mufj.jp). See RFC 4035, Sec. 5.3.1.
  • e-ontap.com zone: The following NS name(s) did not resolve to address(es): fake.tkix.net
  • insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DS has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/TXT has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/SOA has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/MX has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DNSKEY has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • tb6ikxp1jy.insecure.mufj.jp/A has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/AAAA has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/NS has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
Warnings (13)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 60678: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 60678: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/SOA alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC implementers are recommended against implementing signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • com to e-ontap.com: The following NS name(s) were found in the delegation NS RRset (i.e., in the com zone), but not in the authoritative NS RRset: fake.tkix.net See RFC 1034, Sec. 4.2.2.
  • mufj.jp to insecure.mufj.jp: The following NS name(s) were found in the delegation NS RRset (i.e., in the mufj.jp zone), but not in the authoritative NS RRset: ns3.mufj.jp See RFC 1034, Sec. 4.2.2.
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678): DNSSEC implementers are prohibited from implementing signing with DS algorithm 1 (SHA-1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.2.
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678): DNSSEC implementers are prohibited from implementing signing with DS algorithm 1 (SHA-1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.2.
  • www.e-ontap.com/A: The server responded with no OPT record, rather than with RCODE FORMERR. See RFC 6891, Sec. 7. (14.192.44.1, 49.212.106.253, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_K)
  • tb6ikxp1jy.insecure.mufj.jp/A has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DS has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.

DNSKEY legend

Full legend
SEP bit setSEP bit set
Revoke bit setRevoke bit set
Trust anchorTrust anchor
Download: png | svg
Warning JavaScript is required to make the graph below interactive.
DNSSEC authentication graph