combined.mail.abusix.zone
Updated:
2024-05-15 13:53:31 UTC (174 days ago)
Update now
Notices
DNSSEC Authentication Chain
RRset status
Insecure (4)
- abusix.zone/SOA
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/NS
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/SOA
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/SOA
Secure (1)
- zone/SOA
DNSKEY/DS/NSEC status
Secure (7)
- ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 20326)
- ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 5613)
- NSEC3 proving non-existence of abusix.zone/DS
- zone/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 12136)
- zone/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 23226)
- zone/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 60183)
- zone/DS (alg 8, id 12136)
Delegation status
Insecure (3)
- abusix.zone to mail.abusix.zone
- mail.abusix.zone to combined.mail.abusix.zone
- zone to abusix.zone
Secure (1)
- . to zone
Notices
Errors (15)
- NSEC3 proving non-existence of abusix.zone/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
- NSEC3 proving non-existence of abusix.zone/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
- combined.mail.abusix.zone zone: The server(s) were not responsive to queries over TCP. See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.2. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/A: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/AAAA: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/DNSKEY: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN, UDP_-_EDNS0_512_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/DS: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/MX: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN, UDP_-_EDNS0_512_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/NSEC3PARAM: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/SOA: No response was received from the server over TCP (tried 3 times). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.2. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, TCP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_N)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/TXT: The response had an invalid RCODE (REFUSED). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/DS has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
- 4vbwf38za7.combined.mail.abusix.zone/A has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/DNSKEY has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/CNAME has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
Warnings (5)
- NSEC3 proving non-existence of abusix.zone/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
- NSEC3 proving non-existence of abusix.zone/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/NS: The server responded with no OPT record, rather than with RCODE FORMERR. See RFC 6891, Sec. 7. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/SOA: The server responded with no OPT record, rather than with RCODE FORMERR. See RFC 6891, Sec. 7. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN_0x20)
- combined.mail.abusix.zone/SOA: The server responded with no OPT record, rather than with RCODE FORMERR. See RFC 6891, Sec. 7. (3.216.6.59, 44.207.221.1, 54.225.166.129, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN_0x20)
JavaScript is required to make the graph below interactive.
