View on GitHub

DNSViz: A DNS visualization tool

insecure.mufj.jp

Updated: 2021-02-28 08:52:03 UTC (1216 days ago) Update now
« Previous analysis | Next analysis »
DNSSEC options (hide)
  1. |?|
  2. |?|
  3. |?|
  4. |?|
  5. |?|
  6. |?|
  7. |?|
  8. |?|
  9. |?|
  10. |?|
Notices
DNSSEC Authentication Chain

RRset statusRRset status

Insecure (2)
  • insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME
  • www.e-ontap.com/A
Secure (3)
  • com/SOA
  • com/SOA
  • mufj.jp/SOA

DNSKEY/DS/NSEC statusDNSKEY/DS/NSEC status

Secure (14)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 20326)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 42351)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of e-ontap.com/DS
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS
  • com/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 30909)
  • com/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 58540)
  • com/DS (alg 8, id 30909)
  • jp/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 11244)
  • jp/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 4239)
  • jp/DNSKEY (alg 8, id 46369)
  • jp/DS (alg 8, id 46369)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 7, id 19682)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 7, id 60678)
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678)
Non_existent (1)
  • mufj.jp/DNSKEY (alg 13, id 18023)

Delegation statusDelegation status

Insecure (2)
  • com to e-ontap.com
  • mufj.jp to insecure.mufj.jp
Secure (3)
  • . to com
  • . to jp
  • jp to mufj.jp

NoticesNotices

Errors (15)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: An iterations count of 0 must be used in NSEC3 records to alleviate computational burdens. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME alg 13, id 18023: The Signer's Name field of the RRSIG RR (mufj.jp) does not match the name of the zone containing the RRset (insecure.mufj.jp). See RFC 4035, Sec. 5.3.1.
  • jp zone: The server(s) were not responsive to queries over UDP. See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.2. (2001:2f8:0:100::153)
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678): DNSSEC specification prohibits signing with DS records that use digest algorithm 1 (SHA-1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.2.
  • mufj.jp/DS (alg 7, id 60678): DNSSEC specification prohibits signing with DS records that use digest algorithm 1 (SHA-1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.2.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/CNAME has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DS has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/TXT has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/SOA has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/MX has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DNSKEY has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • xza29475d8.insecure.mufj.jp/A has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/AAAA has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/NS has errors; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
Warnings (15)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG NSEC3 proving non-existence of insecure.mufj.jp/DS alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 60678: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/DNSKEY alg 7, id 60678: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • RRSIG mufj.jp/SOA alg 7, id 19682: DNSSEC specification recommends not signing with DNSSEC algorithm 7 (RSASHA1NSEC3SHA1). See RFC 8624, Sec. 3.1.
  • com/DS (alg 8, id 30909): No response was received until the UDP payload size was decreased, indicating that the server might be attempting to send a payload that exceeds the path maximum transmission unit (PMTU) size. See RFC 6891, Sec. 6.2.6. (192.112.36.4, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
  • com/DS (alg 8, id 30909): No response was received until the UDP payload size was decreased, indicating that the server might be attempting to send a payload that exceeds the path maximum transmission unit (PMTU) size. See RFC 6891, Sec. 6.2.6. (192.112.36.4, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
  • mufj.jp to insecure.mufj.jp: The following NS name(s) were found in the delegation NS RRset (i.e., in the mufj.jp zone), but not in the authoritative NS RRset: ns3.mufj.jp See RFC 1034, Sec. 4.2.2.
  • www.e-ontap.com/A: The server responded with no OPT record, rather than with RCODE FORMERR. See RFC 6891, Sec. 7. (14.192.44.1, 49.212.106.253, UDP_-_EDNS0_4096_D_KN)
  • xza29475d8.insecure.mufj.jp/A has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.
  • insecure.mufj.jp/DS has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.

DNSKEY legend

Full legend
SEP bit setSEP bit set
Revoke bit setRevoke bit set
Trust anchorTrust anchor
Download: png | svg
Warning JavaScript is required to make the graph below interactive.
DNSSEC authentication graph