View on GitHub

DNSViz: A DNS visualization tool

co.bw

Updated: 2025-10-15 17:09:22 UTC (54 days ago) Update now
« Previous analysis | Next analysis »
DNSSEC options (hide)
  1. |?|
  2. |?|
  3. |?|
  4. |?|
  5. |?|
  6. |?|
  7. |?|
  8. |?|
  9. |?|
  10. |?|
Notices
DNSSEC Authentication Chain

RRset statusRRset status

Secure (3)
  • bw/SOA
  • co.bw/A (NODATA)
  • co.bw/AAAA (NODATA)

DNSKEY/DS/NSEC statusDNSKEY/DS/NSEC status

Secure (8)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 20326)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 38696)
  • ./DNSKEY (alg 8, id 61809)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/A
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/AAAA
  • bw/DNSKEY (alg 13, id 48016)
  • bw/DNSKEY (alg 13, id 62453)
  • bw/DS (alg 13, id 62453)

Delegation statusDelegation status

Secure (1)
  • . to bw

NoticesNotices

Errors (3)
  • bw/DNSKEY: No response was received from the server over UDP (tried 4 times). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.2. (168.167.168.37, UDP_-_EDNS0_512_D_KN)
  • co.bw/A: The response had an invalid RCODE (SERVFAIL). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (168.167.168.37, UDP_-_NOEDNS_)
  • co.bw/AAAA: The response had an invalid RCODE (SERVFAIL). See RFC 1035, Sec. 4.1.1. (168.167.168.37, UDP_-_NOEDNS_)
Warnings (5)
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/A: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/A: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/AAAA: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • NSEC3 proving non-existence of co.bw/AAAA: The salt value for an NSEC3 record should be empty. See RFC 9276, Sec. 3.1.
  • bw/CNAME has warnings; select the "Denial of existence" DNSSEC option to see them.

DNSKEY legend

Full legend
SEP bit setSEP bit set
Revoke bit setRevoke bit set
Trust anchorTrust anchor
Download: png | svg
Warning JavaScript is required to make the graph below interactive.
DNSSEC authentication graph